Boundary Disputes & Consentable Lines

Boundary disputes are among the most emotionally charged property matters we handle. When neighbors disagree about where their property line falls, the dispute can affect fences, driveways, landscaping, structures, and neighborly relations.

How Boundary Disputes Arise

• Conflicting surveys
• Fences or structures built on the wrong side of the line
• Inaccurate or ambiguous deed descriptions
• Long-standing use that doesn't match legal boundaries
• New surveys revealing discrepancies with existing improvements

Consentable Lines in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania's consentable line doctrine is a powerful legal principle that can resolve boundary disputes without resorting to the strict legal description in a deed. A consentable line is established when:

1. Adjacent landowners accept a boundary line (such as a fence, hedge, tree line, or other marker)
2. For a period of 21 years or more (the same period as adverse possession)
3. The acceptance may be express or implied from the landowners' conduct

Once a consentable line is established, it becomes the legal boundary — even if it differs from the recorded deed description. This doctrine recognizes that practical, long-standing use should prevail over paper descriptions when both parties have treated a line as the boundary for decades.

Key Authority

Soderberg v. Weisel, 687 A.2d 839 (Pa. Super. 1997) — The leading citation for the consentable line as a distinct doctrine in Pennsylvania boundary disputes, separate from adverse possession. If you're asserting — or defending against — a consentable line claim, this is the starting point. The critical distinction: a consentable line requires mutual recognition (express or implied) of the boundary by both adjacent owners for 21+ years. Adverse possession requires only the claimant's hostile use — the neighbor's agreement is irrelevant.